As we have seen, pairs provide a primitive glue
that we can
use to construct compound data objects.
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
shows a standard way to visualize a
pair—in this case, the pair formed by
(cons 1 2).
pair(1, 2).
Original | JavaScript | |
In this representation, which is called box-and-pointer notation, each object is shown as a pointer to a box. The box for a primitive object contains a representation of the object. For example, the box for a number contains a numeral. The box for a pair is actually a double box, the left part containing (a pointer to) the car of the pair and the right part containing the cdr. | In this representation, which is called box-and-pointer notation, each compound object is shown as a pointer to a box. The box for a pair has two parts, the left part containing the head of the pair and the right part containing the tail. |
Original | JavaScript | |
We have already seen that cons pair can be used to combine not only numbers but pairs as well. (You made use of this fact, or should have, in doing exercises 2.2 and 2.3.) As a consequence, pairs provide a universal building block from which we can construct all sorts of data structures. Figure 2.5 Figure 2.6 shows two ways to use pairs to combine the numbers 1, 2, 3, and 4.
Original | JavaScript | |
The ability to create pairs whose elements are pairs is the essence of list structure's importance as a representational tool. We refer to this ability as the closure property of cons. pair. In general, an operation for combining data objects satisfies the closure property if the results of combining things with that operation can themselves be combined using the same operation.[1] Closure is the key to power in any means of combination because it permits us to create hierarchical structures—structures made up of parts, which themselves are made up of parts, and so on.
From the outset of chapter 1, we've made essential use of closure in dealing with procedures, functions, because all but the very simplest programs rely on the fact that the elements of a combination can themselves be combinations. In this section, we take up the consequences of closure for compound data. We describe some conventional techniques for using pairs to represent sequences and trees, and we exhibit a graphics language that illustrates closure in a vivid way.[2]
closurehere comes from abstract algebra, where a set of elements is said to be closed under an operation if applying the operation to elements in the set produces an element that is again an element of the set. The Lisp programming languages community also (unfortunately) uses the word
closureto describe a totally unrelated concept: A closure is an implementation technique for representing procedures with free variables. functions with free names. We do not use the word
closurein this second sense in this book.
In Pascal the plethora of declarable data structures induces a specialization within functions that inhibits and penalizes casual cooperation. It is better to have 100 functions operate on one data structure than to have 10 functions operate on 10 data structures.